> Quoting Josh Trutwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> > Isnt this what this in the CHANGES for rc1 is? >> >> My bad, I haven't been paying attention to the 1.1.20rc posts. >> >> > * SpamAssassin now sets the spamc "username" field to the recipient >> address. >> > This only happens if there is ONE recipient. If a spammer sends a spam >> to >> 20 >> > local users in one SMTP session, then no user-specific SA rules will >> > apply, but all the general SA rules still do of course. Note: As spamc >> > must be passed the recipient address on the commandline, Q-S has to >> strip >> > back the e-mail address to shell-friendly chars - this should be fine >> for >> > 99.9% of your e-mail addresses, but may mean that the more odd >> addresses >> won't >> > be able to access their user-specific SA options. The address is also >> lowercased >> > before being passed to spamc. Note that all this has no effect on the >> recipient >> > address of the e-mail - just the address used for "spamc -u ..." >> >> I suppose I should just go get the RC and play with it. Does it pass >> only >> the username part of the email to spamc? I have virtual users with >> vmailmgr, >> my spamc usernames are full email addresses, so I use spamc -u >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], not spamc -u joe. It was an easy mod to the perl code >> to >> accomplish this so I'm not too concerned. >> >> Thx, >> >> Josh >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >> Welcome to geek heaven. >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >> _______________________________________________ >> Qmail-scanner-general mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general >> > > I had used the patch which at last I saw was for 1.15 or 1.16 im not sure > which > let you define whether it passed the entire domain or the just the > username. I > believe it asked you to define a vpopmail domain, which basically just > allowed > for the ablility to decide whether to strip the domain or not. This would > also > work for vmailmgr as most likely with sql based preferences for virtual > domains > you would use the entire email address. As we are running vpopmail without > any > local users recieving email it was never really a problem for us as all > users > are virtual. > > I am not sure as to the exact functionality in regards to virtual address > space > in CHANGES listed above as I have not had the oportunity to look through > the > code. But my guess from what it says up there is that it is the entire > email > address. I think there was a more advanced patch which actually queried > vpopmail > for the list of domains, but required some additional perl libraries to > talk to > vpopmail. > > -Rich > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Qmail-scanner-general mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general >
I thought so as well....but on my box, it does not input the user...still looks for qmailq in sql... :( ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
