On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:42:12PM -0600, Dallas Engelken wrote: > Ya, that bugged me also... I wrote a patch for it if you want to use it, > or just look at it and find and replace code in your already running system. > This switches it to rfc complient YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss format. The only date > this patch does not effect is the date in the received headers, which is > correct in it's format of DD Month YYYY hh:mm:ss -0000
Can you explain just what that patch does? As it doesn't alter the timestamp in the Received headers, just how could this "fix" a problem with some spamtrap? >From what I can see, your patch simply alters the timestamp used in reports - nothing to do with the email? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
