On 2012-01-30 15:17, Erik Rull wrote:
>
>
>
> On January 30, 2012 at 2:48 PM Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2012-01-30 14:17, Erik Rull wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On January 30, 2012 at 12:52 PM Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2012-01-30 12:34, Erik Rull wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry, but this does not solve my issue. I applied the patch and
>>>>> crosschecked that the resulting file looks fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> The final function looks like:
>>>>>
>>>>> static void sdl_grab_start(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * If the application is not active, do not try to enter grab state.
>>> This
>>>>> * prevents 'SDL_WM_GrabInput(SDL_GRAB_ON)' from blocking all the
>>>>> * application (SDL bug).
>>>>> */
>>>>> if (!(SDL_GetAppState() & SDL_APPINPUTFOCUS)) {
>>>>> return;
>>>>> }
>>>>> if (guest_cursor) {
>>>>> SDL_SetCursor(guest_sprite);
>>>>> if (!kbd_mouse_is_absolute() && !absolute_enabled)
>>>>> SDL_WarpMouse(guest_x, guest_y);
>>>>> } else
>>>>> sdl_hide_cursor();
>>>>> SDL_WM_GrabInput(SDL_GRAB_ON);
>>>>> gui_grab = 1;
>>>>> sdl_update_caption();
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> That makes no sense as gui_grab must be 1 now. Please retry your
>>>> previous instrumentation.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're right. So I added the instrumentation again.
>>>
>>> Still looks strange.
>>>
>>> So I added into the sdl_grab_start() a printf.
>>> Wow - a lot of output!
>>> This pointed me to all other sdl_grab_start() calls (and in additon to
> that
>>> all sdl_grab_end() calls).
>>>
>>> And here are the results of the qemu voting :-)
>>>
>>> I already assigned a usable name to the printf output that is directly
> one
>>> line above the corresponding sdl_grab_*() call, so you should be able
> to
>>> find this easily in your code as well.
>>>
>>> The huge number of recurring printf's are:
>>>
>>> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
>>> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
>>> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
>>> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
>>> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
>>> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
>>> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
>>> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
>>> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
>>> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
>>> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
>>> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
>>> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
>>> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
>>>
>>> Any idea how to proceed?
>>>
>>> Maybe the first two if-statements in handle_activation() cause the
> problem?
>>> Because there the two given functions are called in sequence if both
>>> if-clauses are valid one after the other. Maybe the first one sets the
>>> state so that the second if is valid, too. Maybe a simple else if
> solves
>>> the issue?
>>
>> ev->active.gain makes both clauses mutually exclusive - unless someone
>> messes with the memory of the event object.
>>
>>> I'm not familiar with the variables that are checked here, so
>>> it's just a guess.
>>
>> So handle_activation() is called directly after absolute_mouse_grab(),
>> and the reported event contains
>>
>> state = SDL_APPINPUTFOCUS
>> gain = 0
>> (please validate!)
>>
>> That would mean we are constantly losing the input focus again after
>> trying to gain it via SDL_WM_GrabInput. Weird.
>>
>> What's the call chain for absolute_mouse_grab()?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> --
>> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
>> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
>
>
> Here the results:
>
> Handle Activation 0: at function start (before the first if)
> Handle Activation 1: between the first and the second if
> Handle Activation 2: after the second if
>
> The output is formatted like:
> printf("Handle Activation 0: %d %d %d %d\n",gui_grab,(ev->active.state ==
> SDL_APPINPUTFOCUS),ev->active.gain,gui_fullscreen);
>
> Handle Activation 0: 0 1 1 0
> Handle Activation 1: 0 1 1 0
> absolute_mouse_grab() called from handle_activation()
> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
> Handle Activation 2: 1 1 1 0
> Handle Activation 0: 1 1 0 0
> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
> Handle Activation 1: 0 1 0 0
> Handle Activation 2: 0 1 0 0
> Handle Activation 0: 0 1 1 0
> Handle Activation 1: 0 1 1 0
> absolute_mouse_grab() called from handle_activation()
> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
> Handle Activation 2: 1 1 1 0
> Handle Activation 0: 1 1 0 0
> sdl_grab_end() called from handle_activation()
> Handle Activation 1: 0 1 0 0
> Handle Activation 2: 0 1 0 0
> Handle Activation 0: 0 1 1 0
> Handle Activation 1: 0 1 1 0
> absolute_mouse_grab() called from handle_activation()
> sdl_grab_start() called from absolute_mouse_grab()
> Handle Activation 2: 1 1 1 0
>
> The gain seems to toggle between the successive calls of
> handle_activation...
> Next steps?
Try this:
diff --git a/ui/sdl.c b/ui/sdl.c
index 73e5839..c3fe80d 100644
--- a/ui/sdl.c
+++ b/ui/sdl.c
@@ -828,10 +828,6 @@ static void handle_mousebutton(DisplayState *ds, SDL_Event
*ev)
static void handle_activation(DisplayState *ds, SDL_Event *ev)
{
- if (gui_grab && ev->active.state == SDL_APPINPUTFOCUS &&
- !ev->active.gain && !gui_fullscreen) {
- sdl_grab_end();
- }
if (!gui_grab && ev->active.gain && is_graphic_console() &&
(kbd_mouse_is_absolute() || absolute_enabled)) {
absolute_mouse_grab();
I'm wondering what this code is branch should do anyway. If we grabbed
the input we can't unwillingly lose it. But that's just a theory for
now.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
