On 20/12/22 10:06, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
---
include/monitor/hmp.h | 1 +
include/ui/console.h | 2 +-
monitor/misc.c | 1 -
ui/input.c | 5 +----
ui/ui-hmp-cmds.c | 8 ++++++++
5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/ui/console.h b/include/ui/console.h
index e400ee9fa7..e7f375312c 100644
--- a/include/ui/console.h
+++ b/include/ui/console.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ void qemu_remove_led_event_handler(QEMUPutLEDEntry *entry);
void kbd_put_ledstate(int ledstate);
-void hmp_mouse_set(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict);
+void qemu_mouse_set(int index, Error **err);
Can we return a boolean to indicate eventual failure?
@@ -594,10 +592,9 @@ MouseInfoList *qmp_query_mice(Error **errp)
return mice_list;
}
-void hmp_mouse_set(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
+void qemu_mouse_set(int index, Error **err)
{
QemuInputHandlerState *s;
- int index = qdict_get_int(qdict, "index");
int found = 0;
QTAILQ_FOREACH(s, &handlers, node) {
However no failure is reported, errp isn't used... Do we really
want to pass it along?
