Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 14:08 Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:51:14PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 1:48 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:13 AM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
>> > > >> They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to
>> > > >> elide redundant has_FOO in generated C"
>> > > >
>> > > > Commit is referenced using <commit hash 13 chars min> ("commit header")
>> > >
>> > > Apply my patches in your tree, and your hashes will differ from mine.
>> > > Hashes can serve as stable reference only when we git-fetch patches, not
>> > > when we git-send-email then.
>> >
>> > Has the referenced patch not been pushed upstream already? I thought
>> > it was and hence was asking for the reference.
>>
>> Err, it is just a few patches earlier in this very series you're
>> looking at.
>
>
> Hmm ok. It’s missing from my inbox. Probably was not CC’d to me.
Yes. I'm sorry for the confusion!
