On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:51:14PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 1:48 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:13 AM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
> > >> They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to
> > >> elide redundant has_FOO in generated C"
> > >
> > > Commit is referenced using <commit hash 13 chars min> ("commit header")
> >
> > Apply my patches in your tree, and your hashes will differ from mine.
> > Hashes can serve as stable reference only when we git-fetch patches, not
> > when we git-send-email then.
>
> Has the referenced patch not been pushed upstream already? I thought
> it was and hence was asking for the reference.
Err, it is just a few patches earlier in this very series you're
looking at.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
