On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 08:23:10AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 09/07/2011 08:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:13:00PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>On 2011-09-07 15:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>But if the command is not for users at all, if it's > >>>for qemu debugging, then exposing internals is a very > >>>logical thing. Only problem is - we must make it very very clear > >>>which commands are for qemu debugging. > >> > >>This command it also for users, to debug guests. > >> > >>Jan > > > >Hmm, guest visible state must be stable by definition. > >So why can't we make the interfaces stable then? > > Because right now how you reference devices cannot be stable.
For devices that do have IDs, we can support this on QMP as well then? -- MST
