On 09/07/2011 08:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:13:00PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-09-07 15:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But if the command is not for users at all, if it's
for qemu debugging, then exposing internals is a very
logical thing. Only problem is - we must make it very very clear
which commands are for qemu debugging.
This command it also for users, to debug guests.
Jan
Hmm, guest visible state must be stable by definition.
So why can't we make the interfaces stable then?
Because right now how you reference devices cannot be stable.
Going back to a previous thread, what if the command took a qdev class
type as a filter?
That would be a stable name, not require anonymous IDs, and would have
the property of usually being a single device.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
