On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:49:48 -0800 Ben Widawsky <ben.widaw...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 21-01-06 13:28:05, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:52:56 -0800 > > Ben Widawsky <ben.widaw...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > This implements all device MMIO up to the first capability .That > > > includes the CXL Device Capabilities Array Register, as well as all of > > > the CXL Device Capability Header Registers. The latter are filled in as > > > they are implemented in the following patches. > > > > > > v2: Break out register alignment checks (Jonathan) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widaw...@intel.com> > > Hi Ben, > > > > One buglet / inconsistency inline that I spotted whilst chasing that issue > > with size of reads. > > > > Will get to a full review after messing around ('testing') this a bit more > > ;) > > > > Jonathan > > > > > --- > > > hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > hw/cxl/meson.build | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000..d1b1371e66 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ > > > +/* > > > + * CXL Utility library for devices > > > + * > > > + * Copyright(C) 2020 Intel Corporation. > > > + * > > > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See > > > the > > > + * COPYING file in the top-level directory. > > > + */ > > > + > > > +#include "qemu/osdep.h" > > > +#include "qemu/log.h" > > > +#include "hw/cxl/cxl.h" > > > + > > > +static int cxl_device_check_register_alignment(hwaddr offset, unsigned > > > size) > > > +{ > > > + if (unlikely(offset & (size - 1))) { > > > + return 1; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static uint64_t caps_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size) > > > +{ > > > + CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate = opaque; > > > + > > > + if (cxl_device_check_register_alignment(offset, size)) { > > > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Unaligned register read\n"); > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return ldn_le_p(cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state + offset, size); > > > +} > > > + > > > +static const MemoryRegionOps caps_ops = { > > > + .read = caps_reg_read, > > > + .write = NULL, > > > + .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN, > > > + .valid = { > > > + .min_access_size = 4, > > > + .max_access_size = 8, > > > + }, > > > + .impl = { > > > + .min_access_size = 4, > > > + .max_access_size = 8, > > > + }, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState > > > *cxl_dstate) > > > +{ > > > + /* This will be a BAR, so needs to be rounded up to pow2 for PCI > > > spec */ > > > + memory_region_init( > > > + &cxl_dstate->device_registers, obj, "device-registers", > > > + pow2ceil(CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH + > > > CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET)); > > > > I can see why you jumped directly to sizing this for the whole region, but > > the snag > > is that means I think you missed the fact that patch 8 adds a region after > > the end > > of the mailbox. Doesn't result in an actual bug because the ceil above > > takes > > you way past the space needed though (the memory device region is only 8 > > bytes long). > > > > > > Maybe I misunderstand, but this is the intended behavior. > cxl_dstate->device_registers is the MemoryRegion container for all the > subregions that are the actual device MMIO. > > +------------------+ > ^ | | > | | unused | > | -------------------- > | | memdev regs | > | -------------------- > | | | > | | +--------------+ | > cxl_dstate-> | | | | | > device_registers | | | | | > | | |payload | | > | | |(2k currently)| | > | | | | | > | | | | | > | | +--------------+ | > | | mailbox regs | > | -------------------- > | | device regs | > v -------------------- > | caps regs | > BAR ------> +------------------+ > > > Perhaps I should add this as a comment in the code? I agree with intent but above it is setting limit to the top of the mailbox regs, not the memdev regs which I'd expect to see. > > > > + > > > + memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->caps, obj, &caps_ops, cxl_dstate, > > > + "cap-array", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET - 0); > > > + > > > + memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, 0, > > > + &cxl_dstate->caps); > > > +} > > > + > > > +void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) > > > +{ > > > + uint32_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32; > > > + const int cap_count = 0; > > > + > > > + /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */ > > > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0); > > > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1); > > > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY2, CAP_COUNT, cap_count); > > > +} > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/meson.build b/hw/cxl/meson.build > > > index 00c3876a0f..47154d6850 100644 > > > --- a/hw/cxl/meson.build > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/meson.build > > > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > > > softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_CXL', if_true: files( > > > 'cxl-component-utils.c', > > > + 'cxl-device-utils.c', > > > )) > >