On 06.02.2020 14:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 03.02.2020 12:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>> @@ -2029,6 +2072,19 @@ static void qemu_whpx_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>> #endif
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void qemu_nvmm_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + char thread_name[VCPU_THREAD_NAME_SIZE];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + cpu->thread = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuThread));
>>>>> + cpu->halt_cond = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuCond));
>>>>
>>>> Nitpick, we prefer g_new0().
>>>
>>> In this file other qemu_*_start_vcpu() use g_malloc0().
>>>
>>> I will leave this part unchanged and defer tor future style fixups if
>>> someone is interested.
>>
>> Time to re-run Coccinelle with the semantic patch from commit
>> b45c03f585e.
>
> I thought about it, but then noticed it would be clever to modify
> checkpatch to refuse 'g_malloc0?(.*sizeof.*);'
>
>
As the patchset was reviewed, could we please merge it in the current
(v3) form (*) please?
Feel free to fixup the style after that as you like.
We plan to release NetBSD 9.0 in 1-2 weeks unless there will be a delay.
https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/second_final_release_candidate_for
(*) https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-02/msg01405.html
