On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> writes:
>
> > On 03.02.2020 12:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> @@ -2029,6 +2072,19 @@ static void qemu_whpx_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> >>> #endif
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static void qemu_nvmm_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> >>> +{
> >>> + char thread_name[VCPU_THREAD_NAME_SIZE];
> >>> +
> >>> + cpu->thread = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuThread));
> >>> + cpu->halt_cond = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuCond));
> >>
> >> Nitpick, we prefer g_new0().
> >
> > In this file other qemu_*_start_vcpu() use g_malloc0().
> >
> > I will leave this part unchanged and defer tor future style fixups if
> > someone is interested.
>
> Time to re-run Coccinelle with the semantic patch from commit
> b45c03f585e.
I thought about it, but then noticed it would be clever to modify
checkpatch to refuse 'g_malloc0?(.*sizeof.*);'
