Am 08.06.2011 um 19:39 schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 8 June 2011 18:37, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> wrote:
From Peter's description I believe this could be the root cause of
Rob's
reversed -net /dev/ethX devices as well? That supposedly broke with
0.14. So
for setups earlier than 0.14 reversing would be a bugfix, but if
people
adapted to 0.14 behavior changing it back would break things.
Difficult
call.
OTOH if not many people complained about the 0.13->0.14 transition
then
presumably not very many will complain if we put it back? :-)
Well, I'm all in favor of a consistent, logical FIFO order. I see no
strong reason for O(1) there. :)
Andreas
