On 06/08/2011 12:39 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 June 2011 18:37, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> wrote: >> From Peter's description I believe this could be the root cause of Rob's >> reversed -net /dev/ethX devices as well? That supposedly broke with 0.14. So >> for setups earlier than 0.14 reversing would be a bugfix, but if people >> adapted to 0.14 behavior changing it back would break things. Difficult >> call. > > OTOH if not many people complained about the 0.13->0.14 transition then > presumably not very many will complain if we put it back? :-) > > -- PMM
I suspect most people emulating boards only feed one interface to the thing, so it probably doesn't come up much. Either way, I have a workaround now, but consistency would be nice. Rob
