On 8 June 2011 18:37, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> wrote: > From Peter's description I believe this could be the root cause of Rob's > reversed -net /dev/ethX devices as well? That supposedly broke with 0.14. So > for setups earlier than 0.14 reversing would be a bugfix, but if people > adapted to 0.14 behavior changing it back would break things. Difficult > call.
OTOH if not many people complained about the 0.13->0.14 transition then presumably not very many will complain if we put it back? :-) -- PMM
