On 11/13/19 6:38 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
- -
MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS="aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,i386-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu"
+ -
MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS="aarch64-softmmu,mips64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu"
Aleksandar, since you mostly test 32-bit MIPS, are you OK we keep
mips-softmmu and drop mips64-softmmu here? Another job (acceptance-test)
builds the mips64el-softmmu.
Philippe, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Yes, 32-bit mips targets are
important to us, but, what can we do, time constraints are time constraints, so I agree
with Alex change, please go ahead, Alex. We can test 32-bit mips targets via other
acceptance tests (those that can run longer, so-called "slow" group), and
perhaps we can extend them to test more 32-bit mips systems.
OK, let's keep mips64 as suggested Alex then.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
