> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> > > - - > > MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS="aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,i386-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu" > > + - > > MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS="aarch64-softmmu,mips64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu" > > Aleksandar, since you mostly test 32-bit MIPS, are you OK we keep > mips-softmmu and drop mips64-softmmu here? Another job (acceptance-test) > builds the mips64el-softmmu.
Philippe, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Yes, 32-bit mips targets are important to us, but, what can we do, time constraints are time constraints, so I agree with Alex change, please go ahead, Alex. We can test 32-bit mips targets via other acceptance tests (those that can run longer, so-called "slow" group), and perhaps we can extend them to test more 32-bit mips systems. Thanks to everybody, Aleksandar