On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:32:16PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:32:01AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > Base code for versioned CPU models. This will register a "-4.1"
> > > > version of all existing CPU models, and make the unversioned CPU
> > > > models be an alias for the -4.1 versions on the pc-*-4.1 machine
> > > > types.
> > > >
> > > > On older machine types, the unversioned CPU models will keep the
> > > > old behavior. This way, management software can use old machine
> > > > types while resolving aliases if compatibility with older QEMU
> > > > versions is required.
> > > >
> > > > Using "-machine none", the unversioned CPU models will be aliases
> > > > to the latest CPU model version.
> > > >
> > > > Includes a test case to ensure that:
> > > > old machine types won't report any alias to versioned CPU models;
> > > > "pc-*-4.1" will return aliases to -4.1 CPU models;
> > > > and "-machine none" will report aliases to some versioned CPU model.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > What happens when we add the next new CPU model? So say in 4.2 we add
> > > a new CPU, does that default to being newcpu-4.2 ?
> >
> > We can choose between providing old versions of the CPU model
> > retroactively ("NewModel-4.1" and "NewModel-4.2"), or providing
> > only "NewModel-4.2".
> >
> > The question is: if we provide only "NewModel-4.2", what should
> > be the behavior of "-machine pc-i440fx-4.1 -cpu NewModel"?
>
> Perhaps the existing CPUs and the first instance of a new CPU
> we should use something non-numeric, e.g. 'orig' rather than 4.1;
> we only go numeric when we cause a divergence.
What would be the advantage of a non-numeric version identifier?
I believe it would be more confusing to have (e.g.)
["NewModel-orig", "NewModel-4.3"] in QEMU 4.3 instead of
["NewModel-4.2", "NewModel-4.3"].
However, you have another interesting point: should we introduce
-4.2 versions of all CPU models in QEMU 4.2, or only for the ones
that actually changed? I think I prefer consistency, even if it
means making the list of CPU models larger.
What do others think?
--
Eduardo
