On 5/22/19 4:20 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 21/05/19 22:37, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> But this is the one we're going with? Do we have a plan for teaching it
>>> not to panic for our use of named custom types?
>>
>> If I understood correctly, the patch from Paolo that I have
>> forwarded to this thread is all we need.  Are there other issues
>> with kernel-doc we would still need to address?
> 
> We can find out, but that patch is a good starting point to understand
> that.  After all it's summer of code, not weekend of code. ;)
> 
> Paolo
> 

OK, if that's where we're at! I just saw the RFC from Peter Maydell and
assumed we were a little further along the decision making process, but
maybe not. I'll stay tuned.

--js

Reply via email to