On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 16:18, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > Anyway. What's so special about QEMU that justifies coming up with our > own doc syntax? Other than "we made a hash of it, and cleaning it up > would be work".
The major problem as far as kernel-doc is concerned is that it somewhat bakes in the kernel's style choice that the 'struct' keyword is not hidden behind typedefs, and so it gets a bit confused by QEMU's "use typedefs for struct types" style. The rest, as you say, is just a matter of fixing up our syntax errors. thanks -- PMM
