On 21/05/19 22:37, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >> But this is the one we're going with? Do we have a plan for teaching it >> not to panic for our use of named custom types? > > If I understood correctly, the patch from Paolo that I have > forwarded to this thread is all we need. Are there other issues > with kernel-doc we would still need to address?
We can find out, but that patch is a good starting point to understand that. After all it's summer of code, not weekend of code. ;) Paolo
