On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:36 PM David Kiarie <davidkiar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i hope you don't find this offensive, Eric but i'm forwarding this message > to all the people on this thread. > > i don't find anything exactly private in this email. > > [off-list] > > On 3/4/19 1:20 PM, David Kiarie wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:48 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> On 3/4/19 4:18 PM, David Kiarie wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: David Kiarie <davidkiar...@gmail.com> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> > >> > > > > would i be wrong to say this patch received unwarranted scrutiny from > you, > > Philippe? > > David, please calm down, and don't write emails that can sound like you > are attacking your reviewers on list. Assume good intent - Philippe > reviewed your patch with the same level of scrutiny as many other > patches he reviews, and his question for your previous patch revision > about whether you intended to change the copyright year was not an > attack, but an honest question. > > Open source works best when anyone feels like they can contribute. > Copyright lines are an interesting beast - they carry legal > significance, so care should be taken that they aren't changed by > mistake, but at the same time, you do not have to know the code that the > copyright is protecting to ask an honest question about whether a change > is intentional. > it's simply not fair for me to waiting for you guys to merge this patch. i sent both, you can pick whichever. > > -- > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 > Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org >
