Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 14/11/2018 3:12 am, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this >>> patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should >>> be, but the patch talks about orphaned boards and these four all have >>> active QEMU maintainers listed. >> >> Yeah, I was planning to improve the commit message, >> something along the lines of an extra para: >> >> "The Xilinx boards are maintained, but patches to >> them go via the target-arm tree, so add myself as a >> maintainer there too." >> >> Really this is because we're overloading "maintainer" >> to mean both "this person cares about and is the >> primary reviewer and yes/no decision for them" and >> also "this person is responsible for getting the >> patches into the tree". Perhaps we should instead >> define a new letter tag for the latter ? > > What about adding a "P:" tag for pull request sender? Don't all pull requests generally come from the relevant T: (tree)? We could either extend that or just state the first M: in the list is the person who owns the relevant tree. > > Alistair > >> >> thanks >> -- PMM >> -- Alex Bennée
