On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote: > These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this > patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should > be, but the patch talks about orphaned boards and these four all have > active QEMU maintainers listed.
Yeah, I was planning to improve the commit message, something along the lines of an extra para: "The Xilinx boards are maintained, but patches to them go via the target-arm tree, so add myself as a maintainer there too." Really this is because we're overloading "maintainer" to mean both "this person cares about and is the primary reviewer and yes/no decision for them" and also "this person is responsible for getting the patches into the tree". Perhaps we should instead define a new letter tag for the latter ? thanks -- PMM
