On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:13 PM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this > > patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should > > be, but the patch talks about orphaned boards and these four all have > > active QEMU maintainers listed. > > Yeah, I was planning to improve the commit message, > something along the lines of an extra para: > > "The Xilinx boards are maintained, but patches to > them go via the target-arm tree, so add myself as a > maintainer there too." > > Really this is because we're overloading "maintainer" > to mean both "this person cares about and is the > primary reviewer and yes/no decision for them" and > also "this person is responsible for getting the > patches into the tree". Perhaps we should instead > define a new letter tag for the latter ?
What about changing the 'M:' tag description to the one you just suggested?
