On 2018-11-09 12:29, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> I am also suspicious about hw/bt/ but don't know enough >>> about that subsystem to say if it could benefit from >>> using QOM objects more. >> >> I'm wondering whenever anyone would even notice if we just rm -rf hw/bt >> >> Looking through the changelog for the last five years (after hw/ split) >> the only thing I see is fixing warnings from compiler or coverity, >> adapting to changes in other systems (chardev for example) and treewide >> changes. Not a *single* patch specific to bluetooth ... > > Tried this after studying docs: > > qemu -usb -device usb-bt-dongle -bt hci,vlan=0 -bt device:keyboard > > Segfaults right anway on first keypress. > I guess that qualifies as "broken and obviously unused".
Thanks for checking! I guess that means we could even get rid of it without deprecating it first if it is broken already for more than two releases...? Thomas
