On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > I am also suspicious about hw/bt/ but don't know enough > > about that subsystem to say if it could benefit from > > using QOM objects more. > > I'm wondering whenever anyone would even notice if we just rm -rf hw/bt > > Looking through the changelog for the last five years (after hw/ split) > the only thing I see is fixing warnings from compiler or coverity, > adapting to changes in other systems (chardev for example) and treewide > changes. Not a *single* patch specific to bluetooth ...
Tried this after studying docs: qemu -usb -device usb-bt-dongle -bt hci,vlan=0 -bt device:keyboard Segfaults right anway on first keypress. I guess that qualifies as "broken and obviously unused". cheers, Gerd
