On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> > I am also suspicious about hw/bt/ but don't know enough
> > about that subsystem to say if it could benefit from
> > using QOM objects more.
> 
> I'm wondering whenever anyone would even notice if we just rm -rf hw/bt
> 
> Looking through the changelog for the last five years (after hw/ split)
> the only thing I see is fixing warnings from compiler or coverity,
> adapting to changes in other systems (chardev for example) and treewide
> changes.  Not a *single* patch specific to bluetooth ...

Tried this after studying docs:

  qemu -usb -device usb-bt-dongle -bt hci,vlan=0 -bt device:keyboard

Segfaults right anway on first keypress.
I guess that qualifies as "broken and obviously unused".

cheers,
  Gerd


Reply via email to