Hi, > I am also suspicious about hw/bt/ but don't know enough > about that subsystem to say if it could benefit from > using QOM objects more.
I'm wondering whenever anyone would even notice if we just rm -rf hw/bt Looking through the changelog for the last five years (after hw/ split) the only thing I see is fixing warnings from compiler or coverity, adapting to changes in other systems (chardev for example) and treewide changes. Not a *single* patch specific to bluetooth ... cheers, Gerd
