On 27.04.2018 12:20, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 April 2018 at 07:06, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 26.04.2018 13:54, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> [...] >>> Actually, a worse offender in the "waste everybody's time via redunancy" >>> department could be qom-test. >> >> Shall we change qom-test to also only test with the "none" machine in >> the normal "make check" mode and only do the full test with all machines >> in "make check SPEED=slow" ? > > We definitely want something that tries to instantiate every > machine, because that does catch bugs.
Yes, after having a closer look at this one, I also think that we should *not* change it to run with "none" by default only. The 'qom-list' command results in quite a different output depending on which machine you run it on. Thomas
