Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 27.04.2018 08:31, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:20:25PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> On 26.04.2018 13:45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>>> Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> @@ -260,6 +263,26 @@ static void test_abstract_interfaces(void)
>>>>>> qtest_end();
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static void add_machine_test_case(const char *mname)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + char *path, *args;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Ignore blacklisted machines */
>>>>>> + if (g_str_equal("xenfv", mname) || g_str_equal("xenpv", mname)) {
>>>>>> + return;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + path = g_strdup_printf("device/introspect/concrete-defaults-%s",
>>>>>> mname);
>>>>>> + args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s", mname);
>>>>>> + qtest_add_data_func(path, args, test_device_intro_concrete);
>>>>>
>>>>> This runs test_device_intro_concrete() with "-machine M" for all machine
>>>>> types M, in SPEED=slow mode.
>>>>>
>>>>>> + g_free(path);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + path = g_strdup_printf("device/introspect/concrete-nodefaults-%s",
>>>>>> mname);
>>>>>> + args = g_strdup_printf("-nodefaults -machine %s", mname);
>>>>>> + qtest_add_data_func(path, args, test_device_intro_concrete);
>>>>>
>>>>> This runs test_device_intro_concrete() with "-nodefaults -machine M" for
>>>>> all machine types M, in SPEED=slow mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has "without -nodefaults" exposed additional bugs?
>>>>
>>>> After testing this with all machines, I had to discover that
>>>> "-nodefaults" does not work so easily: A lot of the embedded machines
>>>> (especially the ARM machines) simply refuse to work with "-nodefaults"
>>>> and exit immediately instead. E.g.:
>>>>
>>>> $ arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -nodefaults -nographic -M n810,accel=qtest
>>>> qemu-system-arm: missing SecureDigital device
>>
>> These are all bugs. --nodefaults is supposed to suppress *optional*
>> devices, not mandatory ones.
>
> Even if we fix all the issues, there is still another cosmetic problem:
> Since there are no entries in nd_table[], all the boards with embedded
> NICs start to spill out "warning: nic XYZ has no peer". Should we simply
> suppress that warning in qtest mode?
Makes sense to me.
