On 04/10/2018 11:45 PM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote: > On 04/10/2018 03:40 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 15:16:19 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote: >>> On 04/10/2018 03:03 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 14:24:23 +1000, Richard Henderson wrote: >>>>> On 04/10/2018 02:11 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 16:01:36 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote: >>>>>>> Thanks for doing this grunt work. Me and a colleague were planning to do >>>>>>> this as well after converting the RISC-V frontend to decodetree. Do you >>>>>>> have any plans to do this for the TriCore frontend as well? I have the >>>>>>> same plan for Tricore: Convert it to decodetree, then to translation >>>>>>> loop. >>>>>> >>>>>> I won't do any further conversions in the near future, so please go >>>>>> ahead with your plans :-) >>>>> >>>>> In which case I won't review Emilio's final two patches for risc-v. >>> >>> I'm confused as well :). I don't understand why Richard is not reviewing >>> the last two patch. Maybe you can clarify as well, Richard. >> >> I think he understood you already had patches (not yet on-list) to do the >> trloop conversion for riscv, and therefore my patches should be discarded. > > No, I don't have patches.
Ah, right. Misunderstanding on my part. I'll get back to the risc-v patches soon. >> Note that the first patch in this series does change the TranslatorOps >> interface, that's why I think the whole series should go >> through the same tree (Richard's TCG tree, I presume). > > Works for me. That's fine with me too. r~
