On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 15:16:19 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
> On 04/10/2018 03:03 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 14:24:23 +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> On 04/10/2018 02:11 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 16:01:36 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
> >>>> Thanks for doing this grunt work. Me and a colleague were planning to do
> >>>> this as well after converting the RISC-V frontend to decodetree. Do you
> >>>> have any plans to do this for the TriCore frontend as well? I have the
> >>>> same plan for Tricore: Convert it to decodetree, then to translation
> >>>> loop.
> >>>
> >>> I won't do any further conversions in the near future, so please go
> >>> ahead with your plans :-)
> >>
> >> In which case I won't review Emilio's final two patches for risc-v.
>
> I'm confused as well :). I don't understand why Richard is not reviewing
> the last two patch. Maybe you can clarify as well, Richard.
I think he understood you already had patches (not yet on-list) to do the
trloop conversion for riscv, and therefore my patches should be discarded.
> > I might be mistaken but my impression is that Bastian would be happy taking
> > these risc-v patches (w/ a minor correction, already noted) since he
> > has not yet started the TranslatorOps conversion he planned.
> >
> > Bastian, can you please clarify?
>
> Sure, I can take the three RISC-V patches into my tree and send a pull
> as soon as the next development cycle start.
Note that the first patch in this series does change the TranslatorOps
interface, that's why I think the whole series should go
through the same tree (Richard's TCG tree, I presume).
Thanks,
E.
