On 10/27/2017 03:31 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:42:57 +0200 > Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Yes, we should also replace that with >> >> return s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_GUARDED_STORAGE) >> >> I can fixup my patch or provide a 2nd one. >> > > Consider a fixed up patch acked by me. >
+1 You can keep my ack too. I will try to find some time and read the v2 though.
