On 10/27/2017 02:31 PM, Halil Pasic wrote: gs is explicitly disabled. > > Now that I think about it, maybe the 2.9 binary is going to reject > the explicit gs flag altogether, because it's unknown. > > Isn't this a problem?
No. This is exactly the _solution_ and not the problem. The target will reject unknown cpu features and migration will be aborted. This is exactly what the CPU model is for.
