On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:42:57 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Yes, we should also replace that with > > return s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_GUARDED_STORAGE) > > I can fixup my patch or provide a 2nd one. > Consider a fixed up patch acked by me.
