On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:33:55AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 23/08/2017 10:35, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> If you have a many-core machine, of course, there's no simpler solution > >> than throwing more CPUs at it. :) > > Is it safe nowadays to run "make check -j4" for example? Last time I > > tried (maybe 1 or 2 years ago), there were still issues since some tests > > were using hard-coded temporary file names, so the parallel tests were > > disturbing each other, for example... > > I run -j18 all the time. :)
Nice for those that have 18-way machines at their regular disposal... -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature