On 18.07.2017 17:10, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/18/2017 10:04 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> We should be consistent -- if we can't trust assert() to
>>> be marked nonreturn, as it seems we can't, then we shouldn't
>>> write new code that assumes it always is, even if today
>>> it doesn't happen to bite us on the compiler/host combinations
>>> we're testing right now.
>>
>> And there is also the problem when you compiles with CPPFLAGS+=-DNDEBUG
>> some oldschool guys still have in their ~/.cshrc ;)
> 
> We don't have problems with people defining NDEBUG in their environment;
> such people would already hit at least:
> 
> hw/scsi/mptsas.c:#ifdef NDEBUG
> hw/scsi/mptsas.c:#error building with NDEBUG is not supported
> 
> (maybe we should hoist that to osdep.h, though)

Yes, please. Not every target is build with CONFIG_MPTSAS_SCSI_PCI so we
should move that to a more central place.

 Thomas



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to