On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:53:39 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 03:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > > We could also have check-i386, check-qmp, etc. and check would simply > > > call all of them. > > > > That would be perfect, I think. I mean, if we could stick only to check > > to do all our unit-testing > > Well, the current "make test" is more integration testing than unit > testing, so I'm not sure check can work for that. But autotest can, > which is why I mentioned it. Ah, got it.
