On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:38:34 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 03:26 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:18:34 +0200 > > Paolo Bonzini<pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> This is a small start from the autoconfy configure series. Actually, > >> this part is almost completely new. It cleans up the tests Makefile > >> so that the i386-linux-user testsuite's Makefile targets are more > >> easily extensible and can work wherever a compiler for i386 is > >> installed. In the future this could be extended to ARM and > >> MIPS targets. > > > > This is unrelated to this series, but something that would be very good to > > have would be to move all check- programs to tests/ (or check/) and make > > them > > part of 'make test' or introduce a new 'make check'. > > Right, I thought about that too. The main hurdle is that: 1) right now > almost every test in "make test" is failing; Yeah, just saw that. > 2) the testsuite run by > "make test" is very noisy, does not create logs, etc. If we could use > autotest... :) > > We could also have check-i386, check-qmp, etc. and check would simply > call all of them. That would be perfect, I think. I mean, if we could stick only to check to do all our unit-testing, then it would be easier to setup autotest around it. But we'll have to port current tests to it, of course.
