On 10/22/2010 03:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> We could also have check-i386, check-qmp, etc. and check would simply > call all of them.That would be perfect, I think. I mean, if we could stick only to check to do all our unit-testing
Well, the current "make test" is more integration testing than unit testing, so I'm not sure check can work for that. But autotest can, which is why I mentioned it.
Paolo