On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:54:33PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> Apparently, I don't have experience to induce non-fatal error, device
> error is more of a chance related with the environment(temperature,
> humidity, etc) as I understand.
I'm not sure how to interpret this statement. I think what Alex is
saying is simply that patches should include some justification. They
make changes but what are they improving?
For example:
I tested device ABC in conditions DEF. Without a patch VM
stops. With the patches applied VM recovers and proceeds to
use the device normally.
is one reasonable justification imho.
--
MST
