On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:49:25 +0200 Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:59:09 +1100 > Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:38:24 +1100 > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ppc: system reset interrupt fixes and new hcall IPI > > > > Hi, > > > > We are implementing this new unmaskable IPI hcall for crash dumping > > and debugging. I had some issues with QEMU delivering system reset > > interrupt to guests, which was caused by the HV bit being set. After > > changing that, the interrupt was being handled okay. Should there be > > a more general check to ensure the HV bit is not set in the guest? > > > > I implemented Linux support for the new hcall in crashdump code, and > > it works. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > Nicholas Piggin (3): > > ppc: fix MSR_ME handling for system reset interrupt > > ppc: allow system reset interrupt to be delivered to guests > > ppc/spapr: implement H_SIGNAL_SYS_RESET > > > > hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 8 +++++++- > > target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 10 +++++++--- > > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Weird... these patches didn't make it to qemu-devel. As a result, they > don't appear in patchwork and http://wiki.qemu.org/patches/patches.json
Maybe because I messed up the first mail. I'll resend the series after feedback. Thanks, Nick
