On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 12:58 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > > > With the new chip class per cpu class, does this chip_type field > > serve > > any purpose any more? > > > > > + k->chip_f000f = 0x120d304980000000ull; > > > > A comment somewhere explaining what this cryptic value is would be > > nice. > > It's snapshot from an actual chip ;-) Some of the fields we know about > such as the actual chip "type" and DD version but some are obscure even > to us :-)
Sorry, I actually meant what does "chip_f000f" mean, rather than what
does the value inside there mean.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
