On 09/05/2016 08:59 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 12:58 +1000, David Gibson wrote: >> >> With the new chip class per cpu class, does this chip_type field >> serve >> any purpose any more? >> >>> + k->chip_f000f = 0x120d304980000000ull; >> >> A comment somewhere explaining what this cryptic value is would be >> nice. > > It's snapshot from an actual chip ;-) Some of the fields we know about > such as the actual chip "type" and DD version but some are obscure even > to us :-)
yeah. I have not found a clear definition of all the bits. I will try to make a macro with what I can collect from the specs and the code. Cheers, C.
