Hello Peter, On 08/12/2016 11:21 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 12 August 2016 at 09:33, Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org> wrote: >> On 08/11/2016 12:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> board_id 0 means "I am an EBSA110", which this isn't, >>> and your silicon rev values are completely out of range. >> >> OK. I was not aware of this. I will request new board ids for >> the ast2400 and ast2500 > > Why do you need them? Anything new should be device-tree-only, > and I would expect pushback from the kernel side if you > try to allocate new stuff.
Sorry for the late answer, I was out in Brittany (and it was sunny). I got confused by our aspeed kernel tree which still has some unmerged oddities. I will use -1 for the board ID. Thanks, C.
