On 12 August 2016 at 09:33, Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org> wrote: > On 08/11/2016 12:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> board_id 0 means "I am an EBSA110", which this isn't, >> and your silicon rev values are completely out of range. > > OK. I was not aware of this. I will request new board ids for > the ast2400 and ast2500
Why do you need them? Anything new should be device-tree-only, and I would expect pushback from the kernel side if you try to allocate new stuff. thanks -- PMM
