On 17.02.2016 11:09, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: >> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > > In the long run, I guess we want to have to separate types, one of which > accepts only BlockBackend names and the other one BB and BDS names.
Well, for the second type we shouldn't use bdrv_next() either but bdrv_next_node() instead (and bdrv_get_node_name() instead of bdrv_get_device_name()). Max > Though I think that most HMP commands currently require a BB, so this > patch is okay for now. > > Kevin >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
