Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > There may be BlockBackends which are not returned by blk_by_name(), but > do exist and have a name.
Really? And if so, isn't this a bug? I expect that a BB is always either visible to the user and has a name that is resolved to this BB everywhere, or it's entirely internal and doesn't need a name therefore. Having a BB that is internal and therefore invisble, but has a name and prevents the creation of another BB or BDS with the same name, must certainly be confusing for the user. > blk_name_taken() allows testing whether a > specific name is in use already, independent of whether the BlockBackend > with that name is accessible through blk_by_name(). > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> Kevin
