Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 9 November 2015 at 18:52, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >>> Thanks, I had missed this useful improvement to the API. >>> How does it work in cases like this where we don't have >>> an Error* to fill in? >> >> You do what error_report_err() would do had you had an Error *err to >> fill in: > >> In other words, you print the error message proper with error_report(), >> and the additional information with error_printf(). > > ...so in conclusion Andrew's patch is correct as it stands > and I should just apply it? :-)
Yes. It got my R-by :)
