On 9 November 2015 at 18:52, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >> Thanks, I had missed this useful improvement to the API. >> How does it work in cases like this where we don't have >> an Error* to fill in? > > You do what error_report_err() would do had you had an Error *err to > fill in:
> In other words, you print the error message proper with error_report(), > and the additional information with error_printf(). ...so in conclusion Andrew's patch is correct as it stands and I should just apply it? :-) thanks -- PMM
