On 20 September 2015 at 22:34, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 3 September 2015 at 06:27, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> >> wrote: >> > Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from >> > target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through >> > subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64, >> > because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest >> > address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of >> > target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr. >> > >> > I found and fixed two more related bugs: >> > - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the >> > old one. >> > - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct >> > target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> >> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > Ping. > > What's the status of this patch?
It's waiting for Riku to wake up and put it into a linux-user pull request. thanks -- MPM
